Differences in tibiofemoral kinematics between the unloaded robotic passive path and a weightbearing knee simulator

Abstract

Cadaveric in vitro studies are essential to test hypotheses concerning surgical manipulations in the same individual. Robotic technologies as well as different knee-models have been developed to get an in-depth comprehension of knee joint kinematics. The purpose of this study was to compare utilization of these different established principles.Ten human cadaveric knee specimens were used to measure the kinematics during a weight-bearing flexion in a 6-degrees-of-freedom knee simulator. While flexing the knee, joint quadriceps muscle forces were dynamically simulated to reach a vertical ground reaction force of 100N. Fourteen knee specimens were mounted in 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic manipulator with a universal force sensor. The unloaded flexing motion of each specimen was measured by finding positions for each degree of flexion where all forces are minimal (passive path). The kinematic data of the knee-simulator and the robot concerning internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, varus-valgus motion, and medial-lateral translation was examined.For all investigated degrees of freedom the kinematics of the robotic passive path differed from the loaded kinematics in the knee simulator.Simulated bodyweight as well as the examination method used has a substantial influence on joint kinematics during flexion which has to be considered when interpreting biomechanical studies as well as clinical tests.