Home /Research /Systematic Review of Appropriate Robotic Intervention for Gait Function in Subacute Stroke Patients
LOCOMOTION

Systematic Review of Appropriate Robotic Intervention for Gait Function in Subacute Stroke Patients

Ji-Eun Cho, Jun Sang Yoo, Kyoung-Eun Kim, Sung Tae Cho, Woo Seok Jang, Ki Hun Cho, Wanhee Lee

Year
2018
Citations
68
Access
Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on gait-related function in patients with acute/subacute stroke. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials published between May 2012 and April 2016. This search included 334 articles (Cochrane, 51 articles; Embase, 175 articles; PubMed, 108 articles). Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 7 studies were selected for this review. We performed a quality evaluation using the PEDro scale. In this review, 3 studies used an exoskeletal robot, and 4 studies used an end-effector robot as interventions. As a result, RAGT was found to be effective in improving walking ability in subacute stroke patients. Significant improvements in gait speed, functional ambulatory category, and Rivermead mobility index were found with RAGT compared with conventional physical therapy<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn fontstyle="italic">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>. Therefore, aggressive weight support and gait training at an early stage using a robotic device are helpful, and robotic intervention should be applied according to the patient’s functional level and onset time of stroke.

Keywords

MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationGaitRivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaireGait trainingPhysical therapyStroke (engine)Randomized controlled trialPsychological interventionInclusion and exclusion criteria

Related papers

Browse all LOCOMOTION papers