LOCOMOTION
More complex environments may be required to discover benefits of lifetime learning in evolving robots
Ege de Bruin, Kyrre Glette, Kai Olav Ellefsen
- Year
- 2024
- Access
- Open access
Abstract
It is well known that intra-life learning, defined as an additional controller optimization loop, is beneficial for evolving robot morphologies for locomotion. In this work, we investigate this further by comparing it in two different environments: an easy flat environment and a more challenging hills environment. We show that learning is significantly more beneficial in a hilly environment than in a flat environment and that it might be needed to evaluate robots in a more challenging environment to see the benefits of learning.
Keywords
cs.AIcs.RO
Related papers
LOCOMOTION
Open access📊 3,141 cites
Trust Region Policy Optimization
John Schulman, Sergey Levine, Philipp Moritz +2 more
2015
LOCOMOTION
📊 2,724 cites
Legged Robots That Balance
Marc H. Raibert, Ernest R. Tello
1986
LOCOMOTION
📊 2,658 cites
Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again
1997
LOCOMOTION
📊 2,305 cites
Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion
Wenqi Hu, Guo Zhan Lum, Massimo Mastrangeli +1 more
2018