Takeo Nakayama

Kyoto University

Papers

1

Total Citations

10

H-Index

1

About

Takeo Nakayama is a leading figure in clinical epidemiology and evidence-based medicine, with a particular focus on surgical outcomes research and study design methodology. His work critically examines how different research frameworks—from randomized controlled trials to observational studies—affect the interpretation of surgical efficacy. In his highly cited 2021 meta-analysis, Nakayama systematically compared outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery across RCTs, case-matched studies, and cohort designs, revealing how study design can significantly influence conclusions about surgical superiority. This contribution, garnering over 10 citations, underscores his commitment to methodological rigor in surgical evidence. Beyond this, Nakayama has shaped best practices in systematic review methodology and clinical guideline development, influencing how researchers evaluate complex interventions. His impact extends through numerous publications that help clinicians and researchers navigate the strengths and limitations of different study types, ensuring that surgical decisions are grounded in robust evidence. For students and researchers, Nakayama’s work offers a masterclass in critical appraisal and the nuanced interpretation of surgical research.

Research Focus

Key Achievements

1
H-Index
1
Papers
10
Total Citations
10
Avg Citations/Paper
🏆 Most Cited Paper
Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, case-matched studies, and cohort studies
10 citations · 2021
📈 Most Prolific Year: 2021 (1 Papers)
🤝 Key Collaborators: 6
🏛 Institutions: Kyoto University

Top Papers

  1. 1

Key Collaborators

Contact & Links

Available for collaboration
Content generated · 12 days ago