Home /Research /An Exploration of Social Grouping in Robots: Effects of Behavioral Mimicry, Appearance, and Eye Gaze
HRI

An Exploration of Social Grouping in Robots: Effects of Behavioral Mimicry, Appearance, and Eye Gaze

Ahsan I. Nawroj, Mariya Toneva, Henny Admoni, Brian Scassellati

Year
2014
Citations
4
Access
Open access

Abstract

An Exploration of Social Grouping in Robots: Effects of Behavioral Mimicry, Appearance, and Eye Gaze Ahsan I. Nawroj 1 , Mariya Toneva 2 , Henny Admoni 2 , Brian Scassellati 1,2 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Yale University 2 Department of Computer Science, Yale University Abstract People naturally and easily establish social groupings based on appearance, behavior, and other nonverbal signals. How- ever, psychologists have yet to understand how these varied signals interact. For example, which factor has the strongest effect on establishing social groups? What happens when two of the factors conflict? Part of the difficulty of answering these questions is that people are unique and stochastic stimuli. To address this problem, we use robots as a visually simple and precisely controllable platform for examining the relative in- fluence of social grouping features. We examine how behav- ioral mimicry, similarity of appearance, and direction of gaze influence peoples’ perception of which group a robot belongs to. Experimental data shows that behavioral mimicry has the most dominant influence on social grouping, though this influ- ence is modulated by appearance. Non-mutual gaze was found to be a weak modulator of the perception of grouping. These results provide insight into the phenomenon of social group- ing, and suggest areas for future exploration. Keywords: Attention; Mimicry; Appearance; Grouping; Per- ception. Introduction People naturally categorize others into social groups. These categorizations are made quickly and often depend on super- ficial factors such as behavioral mimicry, physical similar- ity, and directed eye gaze. Despite their superficial nature, social grouping decisions can have lasting impacts on judg- ments about those groups (Tajfel, 2010). Behavioral mimicry involves adopting the nonverbal be- havior of an interaction partner (Baaren, Janssen, Chartland, & Dijksterhuis, 2009). Previous research identifies the im- portance of behavioral mimicry in the perception of human grouping. According to earlier findings, behavioral mimicry can be used to include oneself in a social group (Lakin, Char- trand, & Arkin, 2008). Moreover, some argue it facilitates social communication by increasing affiliation, which results in strengthened relationships (Lakin, Jefferis, Cheng, & Char- trand, 2003; Stel & Vonk, 2010; Baaren, Holland, Kawakami, & Knippenberg, 2004). The effects of behavioral mimicry are not limited to the partners in the exchange. Non-participating observers are known to view interactions with greater de- gree of nonverbal mimicry as more positive (Bernieri, Gillis, Davis, & Grahe, 1996; Parrill & Kimbara, 2006). Likewise, physical appearance is an important factor, as research shows that the presence of similarities between the physical features of interacting parties increases their classi- fication as a cohesive group (Dasgupta, Banaji, & Abelson, 1999). It is suggested that this increase occurs because phys- ical appearance is a salient perceptual feature which evokes the belief that similar group members also share some psy- chological characteristics (Campbell, 1958; Duncan, 1976; Sagar & Schofield, 1980). Direction of gaze is also identified as a factor in some social groupings. Groups of interaction partners in a con- versational setting are found to be influenced by gaze direc- tion (Sacks, Schegloff, & Jefferson, 1974; Goodwin, 1981). While there is some evidence that eye gaze may be an influ- ential factor in the perception of human groups, the lack of support for an effect in a wider range of groupings suggests that this influence may not be generalized to other types of groups. However, gaze direction may enhance the influence of other factors by increasing awareness of them: it is known to cue the attention of an observer (Hietanen, 1999, 2003) even at ages as early as 5 months

Keywords

MimicryGazePsychologyCategorizationPerceptionCognitive psychologyAnimacySocial perceptionNonverbal communicationSocial cue

Related papers

Browse all HRI papers