Home /Research /Examination of Necessity for Pelvic Drain Placement After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
SURGICAL

Examination of Necessity for Pelvic Drain Placement After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Hiroaki Iwamoto, Yoshifumi Kadono, Ryunosuke Nakagawa, Tomoyuki Makino, Suguru Kadomoto, Hiroshi Yaegashi, Masashi Iijima, Shohei Kawaguchi, Takahiro Nohara, Kazuyoshi Shigehara, Kouji Izumi, Atsushi Mizokami

Year
2021
Citations
7
Access
Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pelvic drain (PD) placement is commonly performed after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), but the need for PD placement is unclear. This study aimed to assess the need for PD placement after RARP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analysed the effect of PD placement on postoperative complications in patients who underwent RARP between 2009 and 2018. All patients prior to October 1, 2016 had a PD placed; those after did not. RESULTS: Of the 308 study patients, 231 received a PD (PD group) and 77 did not (ND group). The incidence of ileus, urinary tract infection and anastomotic leak did not differ significantly between the groups; nor did the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic lymphocele at 2 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node dissection is a predictor of asymptomatic lymphocele development two weeks after surgery. CONCLUSION: PD placement is not necessary after RARP.

Keywords

LymphoceleMedicineProstatectomyAsymptomaticDissection (medical)Incidence (geometry)SurgeryAnastomosisUrinary systemUrology

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers