Training Requirements and Credentialing for Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery—What are Our Responsibilities?

Abstract

No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorial1 Sep 2009Training Requirements and Credentialing for Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery—What are Our Responsibilities?is companion ofRobot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Perioperative OutcomesPreliminary Study of Virtual Reality and Model Simulation for Learning Laparoscopic Suturing SkillsTraining, Credentialing, Proctoring and Medicolegal Risks of Robotic Urological Surgery: Recommendations of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons Bradley F. Schwartz Bradley F. SchwartzBradley F. Schwartz More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.074AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Training Requirements and Credentialing for Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery—What are Our Responsibilities?." The Journal of Urology, 182(3), pp. 828–829 References 1 : Evaluating the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education core clinical competencies: techniques and feasibility in a urology training program. J Urol2003; 170: 1312. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Using small-group workshops to improve surgical residents' technical skills. Acad Med2001; 76: 557. Google Scholar 3 : Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century. Arch Surg2000; 135: 786. Google Scholar 4 : A new approach to urology training: a laboratory model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol2004; 172: 1950. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education technical skills competency compliance: urologic surgical skills. J Am Coll Surg2005; 201: 454. Google Scholar 6 : Addressing the new competencies for residents' surgical training. Acad Med2003; 78: 14. Google Scholar 7 : The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol2009; 10: 475. Google Scholar 8 : Practice patterns among urologic surgeons treating localized renal cell carcinoma in the laparoscopic age: technology versus oncology. Urology2003; 62: 1007. Google Scholar 9 : Surgical management of low-stage renal cell carcinoma: technology does not supersede biology. Urology2006; 67: 1175. Google Scholar 10 : Does laparoscopy beget underuse of partial nephrectomy for T(1) renal masses?: Competing treatment decision pathways may influence utilization. J Endourol2007; 21: 1223. Google Scholar 11 American Urological Association: Guideline for Management of the Clinical Stage 1 Renal Mass; 2009. www.auanet.org/content/guidelines-and-quality-care/clinical-guidelines/main-reports/renalmass09.pdf. Google Scholar Department of Urology, Center for Laparoscopy, Endourology and Robotic Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois© 2009 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of Urology17 Jul 2009Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Perioperative OutcomesJournal of Urology21 Jul 2009Preliminary Study of Virtual Reality and Model Simulation for Learning Laparoscopic Suturing SkillsJournal of Urology21 Jul 2009Training, Credentialing, Proctoring and Medicolegal Risks of Robotic Urological Surgery: Recommendations of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons Volume 182Issue 3September 2009Page: 828-829 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2009 by American Urological AssociationMetricsAuthor Information Bradley F. Schwartz More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...