Early feasibility surveillance of gynecologic robotic‐assisted surgeries in Japan

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical relevance of robotic-assisted surgeries (RAS) for gynecologic malignancies in a Japanese multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: A retrospective review of perioperative outcomes of 357 gynecologic RAS procedures was conducted in 24 hospitals accredited to perform RAS by the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) over a 4-year period, January 2014 to December 2017. RESULTS: More than 25 (high), 10-24 (middle) and less than 10 cases (low) were enrolled from 3, 8 and 13 hospitals, respectively. A total of 247 patients underwent RAS for malignant indications. Radical hysterectomy (RH) was conducted for 200 patients, while para-aortic node excision (PAN) for 47 patients. RAS with RH or PAN was more feasible in high-volume centers with significantly shorter operation time and lesser blood loss than that in middle-volume centers. The total rate of perioperative injury and complications in RAS with PAN reached 33.3% in high-volume centers, which was almost equal to those in middle-volume centers (35.5%) but much higher than RAS without PAN (8.5%). CONCLUSION: Perioperative surveillance demonstrated high feasibility of gynecologic RAS procedures conducted in JSOG accredited hospitals for these 4 years. It is mandatory for RAS conducting hospitals to have careful attitudes to realize their learning curves in conducting advanced procedures.