Comparison of postoperative recovery after robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy of T1 renal tumors through retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach: A Japanese single institutional analysis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of recovery in patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and to compare the outcomes of the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. METHODS: This study included 121 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy under general anesthesia from April 2019 to September 2019 at Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. Quality of recovery was defined according to the QoR-40 Japanese version. The participants responded to the QoR-40 Japanese version on three designated days. The patients were assigned to two groups according to the surgical approach: transperitoneal or retroperitoneal. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify independent factors associated with better quality of recovery. RESULTS: Out of the 121 patients, 56 (46%) and 65 (54%) patients were included in the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal group, respectively. Although the QoR-40 Japanese version scores were not different between the two groups at admission, a better quality of recovery was observed in the retroperitoneal group than in the transperitoneal group at discharge based on the total score: physical comfort, emotional state, physical independence and pain. A multivariate analysis showed that the retroperitoneal approach and male sex were associated with a better QoR-40 Japanese version score at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: A retroperitoneal approach offers better quality of recovery than a transperitoneal approach, and therefore it might represent the optimal approach in selected patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.