Dominance and movement cues of robot motion: A user study on trust and predictability

Abstract

We investigate the effect of dominant and submissive movement strategies and a movement cue in a human-robot cooperation scenario on perceived predictability and trust. Four different movement strategies in proximal cooperation between a robot manipulator and a human participant were tested in an experiment in which participants had to arrange small objects in a shared workspace working on the same product as the robot. The features of the robot motion were characterized by dominance or a movement cue. The robot modifies its motion in two ways resulting in four different movement strategies: either it stops when the human is in danger of collision (submissive) or not (dominant), and either it performs a backing-off movement cue or not. The participants evaluated the movement strategies in terms of trust and predictability in a questionnaire. We found that the submissive backing-off movement strategy significantly enhanced the users' trust compared to the dominant movement strategy without movement cue. Other strategies showed no significant differences in trust or predictability.