Robot-Assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: Description of the Technique and Comparative Analysis

摘要

BACKGROUND: Several randomized clinical trials have shown the efficacy of percutaneous transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in decreasing pain after open and minimally invasive surgeries. We postulated that TAP block could be performed by a robot-assisted transperitoneal approach and provide postoperative pain control equivalent to local anesthetic port infiltration. OBJECTIVE: To compare different indicators of postoperative pain between robot-assisted TAP and local anesthetic port infiltration in patients who had undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODOLOGY: A retrospective comparison of 214 consecutive patients undergoing RARP over a 1-year period was conducted. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and outcomes, including time to ambulation, pain score, narcotic usage, and length of stay, were compared. RESULTS: In total, 206 patients were included: 101 received local anesthetic port infiltration and 105 robot-assisted TAP block. There were no differences in estimated blood loss, operative time, time to ambulation, and length of stay between the two groups. The robot-assisted TAP block cohort experienced lesser pain than the local anesthetic port infiltration cohort in the intervals of 6 to 12 hours (2.05 vs 3.21, p = 0.0016) and 12 to 18 hours (2.19 vs 2.97, p = 0.0495) postoperation. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted TAP block is a safe alternative to local anesthetic port-site infiltration. Robot-assisted TAP is associated with lower postoperative pain scores and less narcotic use than local anesthetic port-site infiltration.