Muhammad Uneeb
Papers
2
Total Citations
10
H-Index
2
About
Muhammad Uneeb is a rising surgical outcomes researcher whose work centers on comparative effectiveness in minimally invasive thoracic and upper gastrointestinal surgery. His primary contributions involve rigorous meta-analyses that evaluate robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for non–small cell lung cancer, as well as robotic versus laparoscopic techniques for GERD. In his most cited paper (2025, 8 citations), Uneeb conducted a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, demonstrating that robotic-assisted lobectomy offers comparable surgical quality and oncologic outcomes to VATS, with potential advantages in perioperative safety. His second major work (2025, 2 citations) examined da Vinci-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, finding no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes or dysphagia but highlighting a lower long-term failure rate with the robotic approach. Though early in his career, Uneeb’s methodologically rigorous syntheses are already informing surgical decision-making and guideline development. His focus on patient-centered endpoints and long-term outcomes positions him as a valuable voice in the evidence-based debate over robotic surgery’s role, making his work essential reading for clinicians and researchers evaluating new technologies in thoracic and foregut surgery.
Research Focus
Key Achievements
Top Papers
- 1
- 2