Matthew B. Bailey

Papers

Total Citations

H-Index

About

Matthew B. Bailey is a leading colorectal surgeon and researcher whose work centers on advancing minimally invasive surgical techniques, particularly through comparative effectiveness research. His most-cited study, "Comparison of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes after Laparoscopic vs Robotic Colectomy" (2016, 72 citations), provides critical evidence on the real-world benefits of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. By analyzing the NSQIP database, Bailey demonstrated that while robotic colectomy offers certain advantages, its superiority over laparoscopy remains unproven for many outcomes—a finding that has shaped clinical decision-making and surgical training. His research is instrumental in guiding surgeons and hospitals weighing the high costs of robotic platforms against patient outcomes. Beyond this landmark paper, Bailey’s contributions span postoperative recovery, surgical quality improvement, and the integration of big data into surgical practice. His work has been widely cited by peers evaluating the evolution of colorectal surgery, and he is recognized for bringing rigorous, data-driven clarity to debates around emerging technologies. For students and researchers, Bailey exemplifies how thoughtful comparative studies can inform evidence-based surgery and optimize patient care.