Home /Research /Racial Disparities in the Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer
SURGICAL

Racial Disparities in the Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer

Andrei Gurau, Olivia Monton, Jonathan B. Greer, Norman G. Nicolson, Fabian M. Johnston

Year
2024
Citations
1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Racial disparities in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) utilization across gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are not well characterized. We evaluated racial/ethnic disparities in the use of MIS approaches and associated outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of patients with GI cancer in the National Cancer Database (2010-2020). Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between race/ethnicity and approach. Logistic regression was used to assess 30-day readmission and 90-day mortality. Cox regression was used to analyze overall survival. Models were adjusted for demographics, clinical characteristics, cancer factors, and facility features. RESULTS: Of the 839 398 patients included, 76.9% were White, 11.6% Black, 6.6% Hispanic/Latino, 4.0% Asian, and 0.3% Indigenous. Compared with patients of White race, the odds of robotic surgery were lower for Black (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.93) and Indigenous patients (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.89), but higher for Hispanic/Latino (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.17) and Asian patients (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.21-1.34). Indigenous patients had higher odds of readmission (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.23-1.62), 90-day mortality (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.54), and worse overall survival (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.18). CONCLUSION: Indigenous and Black patients have lower utilization of minimally invasive approaches and worse outcomes in GI cancer care.

Keywords

MedicineLogistic regressionOdds ratioGastrointestinal cancerInternal medicineProportional hazards modelCancerCohortDemographicsEthnic group

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers