Home /Research /Conversational Agents in the Treatment of Mental Health Problems: Mixed-Method Systematic Review (Preprint)
OTHER

Conversational Agents in the Treatment of Mental Health Problems: Mixed-Method Systematic Review (Preprint)

Hannah Gaffney, Warren Mansell, Sara Tai

Year
2019
Citations
2

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> The use of conversational agent interventions (including chatbots and robots) in mental health is growing at a fast pace. Recent existing reviews have focused exclusively on a subset of embodied conversational agent interventions despite other modalities aiming to achieve the common goal of improved mental health. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to review the use of conversational agent interventions in the treatment of mental health problems. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We performed a systematic search using relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane library). Studies that reported on an autonomous conversational agent that simulated conversation and reported on a mental health outcome were included. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> A total of 13 studies were included in the review. Among them, 4 full-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The rest were feasibility, pilot RCTs and quasi-experimental studies. Interventions were diverse in design and targeted a range of mental health problems using a wide variety of therapeutic orientations. All included studies reported reductions in psychological distress postintervention. Furthermore, 5 controlled studies demonstrated significant reductions in psychological distress compared with inactive control groups. In addition, 3 controlled studies comparing interventions with active control groups failed to demonstrate superior effects. Broader utility in promoting well-being in nonclinical populations was unclear. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The efficacy and acceptability of conversational agent interventions for mental health problems are promising. However, a more robust experimental design is required to demonstrate efficacy and efficiency. A focus on streamlining interventions, demonstrating equivalence to other treatment modalities, and elucidating mechanisms of action has the potential to increase acceptance by users and clinicians and maximize reach. </sec>

Keywords

Psychological interventionPsycINFOMental healthCochrane LibraryMEDLINERandomized controlled trialConversationSystematic reviewMedicineDistress

Related papers

Browse all OTHER papers