Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Colectomies Using the 2019 ACS NSQIP Database

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (RLSs) have become increasingly common in the past decade alongside conventional laparoscopic surgeries (CLSs). In general, RLSs have been reported to be superior to CLSs; therefore, we compared both methods among patients undergoing an elective colectomy for differences in perioperative factors and postoperative complications. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. We stratified 5879 patients into two cohorts according to their preoperative diagnosis of either colon cancer or chronic diverticulitis. Patients within each group were further stratified by operative approach. RESULTS: 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CLS may be the more efficient operative technique because it was associated with a shorter average operation time and fewer postoperative complications. This paradigm, however, may change as the robotic technology develops and surgeons become more experienced with RLS.