A flat posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores native knee kinematics, comparable to a double‐bundle reconstruction—A biomechanical robotic investigation
Adrian Deichsel, Florian Gellhaus, Christian Peez, Michael J. Raschke, Moritz Martinovic, Elmar Herbst, Mirco Herbort, Christian Fink, Christoph Kittl
- Year
- 2024
- Citations
- 3
- Access
- Open access
Abstract
PURPOSE: To biomechanically evaluate a flat posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction utilizing rectangular femoral bone tunnels. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen human knee specimens were tested in a six-degrees-of-freedom robotic test setup. In each testing step, a force-controlled test protocol was performed, including 89 N posterior tibial translation (PTT) in neutral, internal and external rotation, from 0 to 90° of flexion. After determining the native knee kinematics, the PCL was cut. Subsequently, a flat PCL reconstruction (PCLR) with a rectangular bone tunnel was performed, utilizing a quadriceps tendon autograft with a patellar bone block. After filling the bone tunnel, a single-bundle PCLR without and with femoral interference screw fixation, as well as a double-bundle reconstruction, was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using mixed linear models. RESULTS: Cutting of the PCL led to significant (p ≤ .05) increases in PTT, from 0 to 90° of flexion, up to 10.7 mm, in comparison to the native state. After flat reconstruction and double-bundle reconstruction, no significant difference was found between the native and reconstructed state (p ≥ .05). The single-bundle PCLR without interference screw showed significantly increased PTT in comparison to the native state in 30° (mean difference [MD] 3.3 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 - 5.2 mm; p < .001), 60° (MD 4.4 mm; 95% CI 2.5-6.4 mm; p < .001) and 90° of flexion (MD 4.0 mm; 95% CI 2.1-6.0 mm; p < .001). The single-bundle PCLR with additional interference screw showed significantly increased PTT in comparison to the native state only in 30° (MD 1.9 mm; 95% CI 0.05-3.8 mm; p = .01). CONCLUSION: Both a flat and a double-bundle PCLR were able to restore the native knee kinematics in all tested flexion angles. A single-bundle reconstruction was not able to fully restore native kinematics, with only small residual anteroposterior instability.
Keywords
Related papers
Statistical Learning Theory
Yuhai Wu, Vladimir Vapnik
1999
Fractional Differential Equations
Igor Podlubný
2025
Applied Nonlinear Control
Jean-Jacques Slotine, Weiping Li
1991
Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection
John R. Koza
1992