[Current problems in surgical oncology. Part 3. Total mesorectal excision with curative intent. Why are not all patients with rectal cancer treated with minimally invasive procedures (either by laparoscopy or by robotic surgery)?].
Cătălin Vasilescu
- Year
- 2011
- Citations
- 4
Abstract
The main evaluation criterion in rectum cancer surgery is the accuracy of total mesorectal excision (TME). Laparoscopic TME has some advantages (sharp dissection, a better visibility) over open surgery; there are other factors that limited the dissemination of the laparoscopic approach (rigid instruments, with a limited maneuverability). Laparoscopic TME can be beneficial for selected patients. Robotic surgery, with a better view and instrument versatility, may overcome in part the limitations of laparoscopic TME. The excellent results demonstrated by robotic surgery in other types of pelvic malignancies (in urology and gynecology) are expected in the treatment of rectum cancer surgery. However, still remain patients with advanced rectum cancers that can be operated correctly only by open surgery. Laparoscopy and robotics are only tools and not aims of the oncological surgery.
Keywords
Related papers
Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets
Daron Acemoğlu, Pascual Restrepo
2019
Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm
Leigh R. Hochberg, Daniel Bacher, Beata Jarosiewicz +8 more
2012
Campbell-Walsh urology
Alan J. Wein editor-in-chief
2012
Stroke rehabilitation
Peter Langhorne, Julie Bernhardt, Gert Kwakkel
2011