Re: Robotic versus Open Level I-II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: A Matched Group Comparative Analysis

Abstract

No AccessJournal of UrologyLetter to the Editor/Errata1 May 2018Re: Robotic versus Open Level I-II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: A Matched Group Comparative AnalysisL. Gu, X. Ma, Y. Gao, H. Li, X. Li, L. Chen, B. Wang, Y. Xie, Y. Fan and X. Zhang J Urol 2017; 198: 1241–1246. Bimal Bhindi and Bradley C. Leibovich Bimal BhindiBimal Bhindi More articles by this author and Bradley C. LeibovichBradley C. Leibovich More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.044AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Re: Robotic versus Open Level I-II Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: A Matched Group Comparative Analysis." The Journal of Urology, 199(5), pp. 1351–1352 References 1 : The Mayo Clinic experience with surgical management, complications and outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumour thrombus. BJU Int2004; 94: 33. Google Scholar 2 : Clinical and radiographic predictors of the need for inferior vena cava resection during nephrectomy for patients with renal cell carcinoma and caval tumour thrombus. BJU Int2015; 116: 388. Google Scholar 3 : Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med2009; 28: 3083. Google Scholar © 2018 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 5May 2018Page: 1351-1352 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Bimal Bhindi More articles by this author Bradley C. Leibovich More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...