Home /Research /Staging Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Strongly Depends on Lymph Node Tumor Burden
SURGICAL

Staging Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Strongly Depends on Lymph Node Tumor Burden

Oktay Özman, Hans Veerman, Roberto Contieri, Matteo Droghetti, Maarten L. Donswijk, Marinus J. Hagens, Pim J. van Leeuwen, André N. Vis, H.G. Van Der Poel

Year
2024
Citations
4
Access
Open access

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the factors affecting the lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) and to evaluate its prognostic value for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: Patients who had intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer and underwent robot-assisted (RA)RP between 2017 and 2021 were included. Initial lymph node staging was carried out using PSMA PET/CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated. A cut-off value for LNM tumor deposit size that maximizes specificity was investigated and a post hoc specificity analysis was carried out. In survival analysis for biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) after RP, Kaplan–Meier curves of molecular imaging (mi)N0 and miN1 patients were compared using the log-rank test and separate Cox regression models were developed to reveal the significance of PSMA PET/CT staging in pre- and post-surgery settings. Results: In 583 patients with a prevalence of pathology-proven LNM of 27.4%, overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PSMA PET/CT per patient were 26.3% [95%CI 18.9–35.5], 93.9% [95%CI 84.9–100], 61.8% [95%CI 44.5–83.5], and 77.1% [95%CI 69.7–85.1], respectively. PSMA PET/CT showed a better sensitivity as LNM tumor deposit size increased (p = 0.003 OR 2.4 [95%CI 1.3–4.4]) and a better specificity in pT3-4 tumors (96.1%) versus pT2 (91.1%, p = 0.024 OR 2.7 [95%CI 1.1–6.3]). After adjustment according to 5.5 mm LNM tumor deposit size, which showed the best discriminative performance (AUC: 0.905 [95%CI 0.804–1.000, p < 0.001]), overall sensitivity tripled (90.2%, p < 0.001). The 1-year bPFS was 56.0% and 83.3% for miN1 and miN0 patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Whereas miN0pN1 was not, miN1pN1 disease was independently associated with decreased bPFS (HR:2.1 95%CI 1.3–3.4, p < 0.001). Conclusions: PSMA PET/CT has a lymph node tumor burden-dependent and cohort-driven diagnostic ability but consequently a strong independent prognostic value for predicting biochemical recurrence after RARP.

Keywords

MedicineLymph nodeGlutamate carboxypeptidase IIProstate-specific antigenAntigenValue (mathematics)Prostate cancerOncologyProstateInternal medicine

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers