A Laparoscopic Approach is Best for Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

Abstract

No AccessJournal of UrologyOpposing Views1 Jun 2017A Laparoscopic Approach is Best for Retroperitoneal Lymph Node DissectionYes James R. Porter James R. PorterJames R. Porter More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.065AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail References 1 : Utilization of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer in the United States: Results from the National Cancer Database (1998–2011). Urol Oncol2016; 34: 487. Google Scholar 2 : Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: does it still have a role in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer? A European perspective. Eur Urol2008; 54: 1004. Google Scholar 3 : Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: indications and limitations. J Urol1996; 156: 1108. Google Scholar 4 : Risk of systemic metastases in clinical stage I nonseminoma germ cell testis tumor managed by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J Urol2000; 163: 1721. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: evolution of the technique. Eur Urol2016; 70: 661. Google Scholar © 2017 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 6June 2017Page: 1384-1386 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information James R. Porter More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...