Home /Research /A Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Patients with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction
SURGICAL

A Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Patients with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Niwat Lukkanawong, Masashi Honda, Shogo Teraoka, Hideki Iwamoto, Shuichi Morizane, Katsuya Hikita, Atsushi Takenaka

Year
2022
Citations
7
Access
Open access

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Methods: Between March 2008 and May 2019, the patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Results: = 0.029). Conclusion: Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is safe and excellent success rates in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. However, our experience study suggested that robotic surgery improves a total operative time, decreases drain removal time and less intraoperative blood loss than laparoscopic approach.

Keywords

Ureteropelvic junctionMedicinePyeloplastyLaparoscopic surgeryLaparoscopySurgeryHydronephrosisAnatomyUrinary system

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers