Home /Research /Robotic-assisted vs video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on surgical quality, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes

SURGICAL

Robotic-assisted vs video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on surgical quality, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes

Wajahat Mirza, Arsalan Javid, Muhammad Uneeb, Abdullah Khan, Hadi Mohammad Khan, Sundus Dadan, Saeeda Yasmin, Hamza Hanif

Year: 2025
Citations: 8

Keywords

Randomized controlled trialPerioperativeThoracotomyLung cancerMeta-analysisChest tubeVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgeryLymph node

Robotic-assisted vs video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on surgical quality, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes

Keywords

Related papers

Campbell-Walsh urology

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines

Principles of Robot Motion: Theory, Algorithms, and Implementations

A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction