Home /Research /Feasibility Evaluation of 3 Automated Cellular Drug Screening Assays on a Robotic Workstation
OTHER

Feasibility Evaluation of 3 Automated Cellular Drug Screening Assays on a Robotic Workstation

Anne Soikkeli, Cristina Sempio, Ann Marie Kaukonen, Arto Urtti, Jouni Hirvonen, Marjo Yliperttula

Year
2009
Citations
10
Access
Open access

Abstract

This study presents the implementation and optimization of 3 cell-based assays on a TECAN Genesis workstation—the Caspase-Glo® 3/7 and sulforhodamine B (SRB) screening assays and the mechanistic Caco-2 permeability protocol—and evaluates their feasibility for automation. During implementation, the dispensing speed to add drug solutions and fixative trichloroacetic acid and the aspiration speed to remove the supernatant immediately after fixation were optimized. Deco ntamination steps for cleaning the tips and pipetting tubing were also added. The automated Caspase-Glo® 3/7 screen was successfully optimized with Caco-2 cells (Z′ 0.7, signal-to-base ratio [S/B] 1.7) but not with DU-145 cells. In contrast, the automated SRB screen was successfully optimized with the DU-145 cells (Z′ 0.8, S/B 2.4) but not with the Caco-2 cells (Z′ –0.8, S/B 1.4). The automated bidirectional Caco-2 permeability experiments separated successfully low- and high-permeability compounds (Z′ 0.8, S/B 84.2) and passive drug permeation from efflux-mediated transport (Z′ 0.5, S/B 8.6). Of the assays, the homogeneous Caspase-Glo® 3/7 assay benefits the most from automation, but also the heterogeneous SRB assay and Caco-2 permeability experiments gain advantages from automation. This study presents the implementation and optimization of 3 cell-based assays on a TECAN Genesis workstation—the Caspase-Glo® 3/7 and sulforhodamine B (SRB) screening assays and the mechanistic Caco-2 permeability protocol—and evaluates their feasibility for automation. During implementation, the dispensing speed to add drug solutions and fixative trichloroacetic acid and the aspiration speed to remove the supernatant immediately after fixation were optimized. Deco ntamination steps for cleaning the tips and pipetting tubing were also added. The automated Caspase-Glo® 3/7 screen was successfully optimized with Caco-2 cells (Z′ 0.7, signal-to-base ratio [S/B] 1.7) but not with DU-145 cells. In contrast, the automated SRB screen was successfully optimized with the DU-145 cells (Z′ 0.8, S/B 2.4) but not with the Caco-2 cells (Z′ –0.8, S/B 1.4). The automated bidirectional Caco-2 permeability experiments separated successfully low- and high-permeability compounds (Z′ 0.8, S/B 84.2) and passive drug permeation from efflux-mediated transport (Z′ 0.5, S/B 8.6). Of the assays, the homogeneous Caspase-Glo® 3/7 assay benefits the most from automation, but also the heterogeneous SRB assay and Caco-2 permeability experiments gain advantages from automation.

Keywords

Sulforhodamine BHigh-content screeningChemistryChromatographyComputer scienceCytotoxicityCellBiochemistryIn vitro

Related papers

Browse all OTHER papers