Comparison between single‐site and multiport robot‐assisted hysterectomy in obese patients with endometrial cancer: An Italian multi‐institutional study
Giacomo Corrado, Liliana Mereu, Stefano Bogliolo, Vito Cela, Bárbara Gardella, Isabella Sperduti, Camilla Certelli, A Pellegrini, Giulia Posar, Ashanti Zampa, Saverio Tateo, Angiolo Gadducci, Arsenio Spinillo, Enrico Vizza
- Year
- 2019
- Citations
- 12
Abstract
Abstract Background The aim of this study is to compare robotic single‐site hysterectomy (RSSH) and robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for endometrial cancer (EC) in obese patients in terms of surgical outcomes. Methods This retrospective study compares RSSH with RMPH in obese patients with EC and FIGO stages I to II divided in three classes according to their body mass index (BMI): class A (30‐34.9 kg/m 2 ), class B (35‐39.9 kg/m 2 ), and class C (>40 kg/m 2 ). Results We included 225 patients (RSSH: 76; RMPH: 149). The operative time and estimated blood loss (EBL) were lower in the A class of the RSSH group. The EBL and the conversion rate increased when the BMI increased in the RSSH group. The hospital stay was higher in the A class of the RMPH group. Conclusions The advantages of RSSH in terms of reduced invasiveness remain true only in the first BMI class, whereas they are lost when the BMI increased.
Keywords
Related papers
Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets
Daron Acemoğlu, Pascual Restrepo
2019
Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm
Leigh R. Hochberg, Daniel Bacher, Beata Jarosiewicz +8 more
2012
Campbell-Walsh urology
Alan J. Wein editor-in-chief
2012
Stroke rehabilitation
Peter Langhorne, Julie Bernhardt, Gert Kwakkel
2011