Outcomes and quality of life after Robot-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: both three-port procedures performed by a single surgeon

Abstract

Background: At present, research comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer is insufficient. This paper aimed to compare the safety, short-term efficacy, quality of life (QoL), and delayed complications at 6 weeks postoperatively via a retrospectively controlled study by a single surgeon. Methods: A total of 110 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases from December 2020 to May 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study, and were divided into RATS and VATS groups (both three-port procedures) according to the patients' preference. The propensity-score matching method was applied to control the potential differences. The patients were treated with lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer by RATS or VATS, and the safety outcomes were evaluated. The follow-up was initiated after surgery, and the outcome assessments including hospitalization costs, short-term efficacy, pain and QoL, were collected and analyzed. Results: 93.02±15.21, respectively, P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the other indicators. Conclusions: Despite its high cost, RATS showed considerable potential for reducing the operation time and improving the QoL of patients. Meanwhile, RATS and VATS exhibited similar perioperative safety and short-term efficacy in lobectomy and segmentectomy.