The Power and the Peril of Large Administrative Databases

Abstract

No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorial1 Jul 2015The Power and the Peril of Large Administrative Databases David F. Penson David F. PensonDavid F. Penson View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.002AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "The Power and the Peril of Large Administrative Databases." The Journal of Urology, 194(1), pp. 10–11 References 1 National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: Overview. Available at http://seer.cancer.gov/about/overview.html. Accessed May 4, 2015. Google Scholar 2 National Cancer Institute: Healthcare Delivery Research: Seer-Medicare Linked Database. Available at http://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/seermedicare/. Accessed May 4, 2015. Google Scholar 3 National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: PSA Values and SEER Data. Available at http://seer.cancer.gov/data/psa-values.html. Accessed May 4, 2015. Google Scholar 4 : Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline. Cancer Causes Control2008; 19: 175. Google Scholar 5 : Variation in use of active surveillance among men undergoing expectant treatment for early stage prostate cancer. J Urol2014; 192: 75. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy versus no local therapy for survival benefit in metastatic prostate cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis. J Urol2015; . Epub ahead of print. Google Scholar 7 : Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era. J Clin Oncol2014; 32: 1419. Google Scholar 8 : Technology diffusion and diagnostic testing for prostate cancer. J Urol2013; 190: 1715. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men. JAMA2006; 296: 2683. Google Scholar 10 : Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA2009; 302: 1557. Google Scholar 11 : Increasing use of observation among men at low risk for prostate cancer mortality. J Urol2015; 193: 801. Link, Google Scholar © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byPilon D, Ellis L, Behl A, Gozalo L, Emond B, Lefebvre P, Calabrese R, Prime H and Gaylis F (2018) Assessment of Evidence-Based Standards in the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer in a Community PracticeUrology Practice, VOL. 4, NO. 3, (218-224), Online publication date: 1-May-2017.Pearce S, Pariser J, Karrison T, Patel S and Eggener S (2018) Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based CohortJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 1, (76-81), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016. Volume 194Issue 1July 2015Page: 10-11 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information David F. Penson More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...