PCL to graft impingement pressure after anatomical or non‐anatomical single‐bundle ACL reconstruction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft impingement against the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) has been postulated, but not thoroughly investigated. PURPOSE: To evaluate PCL impingement pressure and biomechanical stability with different tibial and femoral tunnel positions in ACL reconstruction. METHODS: In 15 porcine knees, the impingement pressure between ACL and PCL was measured using pressure sensitive film before and after ACL single-bundle reconstruction. ACL reconstructions were performed in each knee with three different tibial and femoral tunnel position combinations: (1) tibial antero-medial (AM) tunnel to femoral AM tunnel (AM-AM), (2) tibial postero-lateral (PL) tunnel to femoral High-AM tunnel (PL-High-AM) and (3) tibial AM tunnel to femoral High-AM tunnel (AM-High-AM). Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was evaluated after each ACL reconstruction using robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. RESULTS: There was no significant difference of the impingement pressure between AM and AM, PL-High-AM reconstructed groups and intact ACL. Only AM-High-AM ACL reconstruction group showed significantly higher impingement pressure compared with intact ACL. With regard to ATT, AM-AM group had significantly higher stiffness than PL-High-AM group. CONCLUSION: Anatomical ACL reconstruction does not cause PCL impingement and it has biomechanical advantage in ATT when compared with non-anatomical ACL reconstructions in porcine knee. For the clinical relevance, in the anatomical ACL reconstruction, no ACL-PCL impingement is found.