Home /Research /Comparison of outcomes of salvage robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for post‐primary radiation vs focal therapy
SURGICAL

Comparison of outcomes of salvage robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for post‐primary radiation vs focal therapy

Fikret Fatih Önol, Márcio Covas Moschovas, Travis Rogers, Hariharan Palayapalayam Ganapathi, Shannon Roof, Bernardo Rocco, Vipul Patel

Year
2019
Citations
42
Access
Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare salvage robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) outcomes in patients who underwent radiation and those who underwent focal ablation as primary therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 126 patients who underwent salvage RALPbetween 2008 and 2018. Of these, 94 (74.6%) received radiation and 32 focal ablation (25.4%) as primary therapy. These groups were compared with regard to clinical, oncological and functional outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and regression models were used to identify survival estimations and their predictors. RESULTS: Before surgery, more patients were potent in the focal ablation group compared to the radiation group (46.9% vs 22.6%; P = 0.013). Peri-operative characteristics and complication rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Postoperative catheterization duration was shorter in the focal ablation group (mean 10 vs 16 days; P = 0.018). At final pathology, the focal ablation group had higher non-organ-confined disease (71% vs 50%; P = 0.042) and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates (43.8% vs 17%; P = 0.004) as compared to the radiation group; however, 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival rates were similar (59% vs 56%; P = 0.761). Postoperative 1-year full (no pads/day) and social (0-1 pad/day) continence rates were significantly higher in the focal ablation as compared to the radiation group (77.3% vs 39.2%, P = 0.002, and 87.5% vs 51.3%, P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed primary focal ablation and nerve-sparing to be predictors of postoperative continence. Erectile function was preserved in 13% and 27% of preoperatively potent patients in the radiation and focal ablation groups, respectively (P = 0.435). No predictors were identified for postoperative potency. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation was associated with inferior functional outcomes after salvage RALP. Focal therapies were associated with higher non-organ-confined disease and PSMrates, with no significant difference in short-term BCR-free survival.

Keywords

MedicineAblationProstatectomyRadiation therapySurgeryUrologyComplicationBiochemical recurrenceSalvage therapyCosmesis

Related papers

Browse all SURGICAL papers