Reconstructive algorithm and classification system for transoral oropharyngeal defects
John R. de Almeida, Richard Chan Woo Park, Nathaniel L. Villanueva, Brett A. Miles, Marita S. Teng, Eric M. Genden
- Year
- 2013
- Citations
- 77
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transoral techniques for oropharyngeal tumors, such as transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and transoral laser microsurgery, require new reconstructive considerations. METHODS: Defects from 92 patients undergoing TORS were classified into 4 classes. A reconstruction algorithm was followed. Perioperative outcomes and complications were assessed. Forty-seven patients completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) swallowing questionnaire and a modified Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Quality of Life (VPIQL) questionnaire postoperatively. RESULTS: The most common reconstructions involved velopharyngoplasties with local flaps (39%), local flaps alone (25%), or secondary healing (20%). More advanced defects (class III and IV defects) required regional and free flaps more often. No significant differences were found in MDADI scores or VPIQL scores among the 4 defect classes. Only adjuvant radiotherapy was a predictor of poor swallowing (p = .02). CONCLUSION: The classification system for transoral oropharyngeal defects maps defects into 4 classes and guides the reconstructive thought process.
Keywords
Related papers
Planning Algorithms
Steven M. LaValle
2006
Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications
Mark de Berg, Otfried Cheong, Marc van Kreveld +1 more
1997
Planning Algorithms
Steven M. LaValle
2006
The university of Florida sparse matrix collection
Timothy A. Davis, Yifan Hu
2011