Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of ARtificial Intelligence in Emergency and Trauma Surgery, the ARIES Project: An international web-based survey
Belinda De Simone, Fikri M. Abu‐Zidan, Andrew A. Gumbs, Élie Chouillard, Salomone Di Saverio, Massimo Sartelli, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Toby Collins, Yoram Kluger, Ernest E. Moore, Ari Leppäniemi, Andrey Litvin, Pietro Mascagni, Luca Milone, Micaela Piccoli, Michael Sugrue, Walter L. Biffl, Fausto Catena
- 发表年份
- 2021
- 引用次数
- 3
- 访问权限
- 开放获取
摘要
Abstract Aim: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practices in the application of artificial intelligence in the emergency setting among international acute care and emergency surgeons. Methods: An online questionnaire composed of 30 multiple choice and open-ended questions was sent to the members of the World Society of Emergency Surgery between 29th May and 28th August 2021. The questionnaire was developed by a panel of 11 international experts and approved by the WSES steering committee. Results: 200 participants answered the survey, 32 were females (16%). 172 (86%) surgeons thought that artificial intelligence will improve acute care surgery. Fifty surgeons (25%) were trained on robotic surgery and can perform it. Only 19 (9.5%) were currently performing it. 126 (63%) surgeons do not have a robotic system in their institution, and for those who have it, it was mainly used for elective surgery. Only 100 surgeons (50%) were able to define different artificial intelligence terminology. Participants thought that artificial intelligence is useful to support training and education (61.5%), perioperative decision making (59.5%), and surgical vision (53%) in emergency surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females in ability, interest in training or expectations of artificial intelligence (p values 0.91, 0.82, and 0.28 respectively, Mann-Whitney U test). Ability was significantly correlated with interest and expectations (p< 0.0001 Pearson rank correlation, rho 0.42 and 0.47 respectively) but not with experience (p = 0.9, rho -0.01) Conclusions: The implementation of artificial intelligence in the emergency and trauma setting is still in an early phase. The support of emergency and trauma surgeons is essential for the progress of AI in their setting which can be augmented by proper research and training programs in this area.
关键词
相关论文
The Organization of Behavior
D. O. Hebb
2005
The spread of true and false news online
Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, Sinan Aral
2018
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.
Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, John T. Cacioppo
2007
Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets
Daron Acemoğlu, Pascual Restrepo
2019