Papers
3
Total Citations
84
H-Index
3
About
Lisa E. Paddock is a health services researcher whose work centers on improving the quality of surgical care for men with prostate cancer. Her major contributions lie in critically evaluating the real-world outcomes of different treatment approaches, particularly the comparative effectiveness of robotic versus open radical prostatectomy. Her most cited paper (64 citations) challenges the widespread adoption of robotic surgery by revealing that it does not consistently offer superior functional outcomes or disease control compared to the open approach, a finding with significant implications for clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. Paddock has also advanced the field by helping to translate patient-reported outcome measures into clinically meaningful information. Her work on the EPIC-26 questionnaire (13 citations) clarifies how domain scores relate to tangible functional outcomes, enabling better patient counseling. Additionally, through the CEASAR study (7 citations), she has assessed the link between quality measures and actual patient outcomes, highlighting gaps in nationally endorsed standards. Paddock’s research is distinguished by its use of large, population-based cohorts to provide robust, evidence-based insights that directly inform surgical practice and patient expectations.
Research Focus
Key Achievements
Top Papers
- 1
- 2
- 3