Elizabeth Ty Wilde

Papers

Total Citations

187

H-Index

About

Elizabeth Ty Wilde is a leading health services researcher whose work centers on comparative effectiveness in gynecologic oncology, with a particular focus on surgical outcomes and health policy. Her most-cited study, a 2012 population-based analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer (187 citations), provided critical real-world evidence on the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery outside of highly specialized centers. This landmark work challenged prevailing assumptions by demonstrating that robotic hysterectomy could be performed with comparable outcomes to laparoscopy in broader clinical settings, directly informing surgical guidelines and hospital resource allocation. Wilde’s research has had substantial impact, shaping how surgeons and policymakers evaluate the adoption of costly robotic technologies. Her contributions extend to understanding disparities in surgical care and the translation of clinical innovations into routine practice. By leveraging large-scale administrative data, she has produced actionable insights that bridge the gap between clinical trials and everyday patient care, making her a trusted voice in evidence-based surgical decision-making.