Papers

10

Total Citations

553

H-Index

8

About

Chang Woo Kim is a leading colorectal surgeon whose research has fundamentally shaped the adoption and evaluation of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. His work centers on comparing robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgical approaches, with a particular focus on outcomes, learning curves, and cost-effectiveness. Kim’s landmark 2014 systematic review, with 209 citations, provided a comprehensive comparison of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery against laparoscopic and open methods, establishing a critical evidence base for the field. He is especially renowned for his pioneering analyses of the learning curve in robotic low anterior resection, demonstrating that robotic systems can shorten the steep learning curve associated with laparoscopic techniques—a finding that has guided surgical training worldwide. His 2015 cost-effectiveness study (69 citations) directly addressed the economic barriers to robotic surgery adoption, showing that despite higher upfront costs, robotic approaches can be justified by improved short-term outcomes. With over 540 total citations across his most-cited works, Kim’s research has been instrumental in moving robotic rectal surgery from experimental to mainstream, providing surgeons and hospitals with the data needed to make informed decisions about technology adoption and patient care.

Research Focus

Key Achievements

8
H-Index
10
Papers
553
Total Citations
55
Avg Citations/Paper
🏆 Most Cited Paper
Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery Compared with Laparoscopic and Open Surgery: a Systematic Review
209 citations · 2014
📈 Most Prolific Year: 2014 (4 Papers)
🤝 Key Collaborators: 25
🏛 Institutions: Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Creative Commons, Ajou University, Kyung Hee University

Top Papers

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
    Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter than laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?: a comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries.
    10 citations · 2014
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Key Collaborators

Contact & Links

Available for collaboration
Content generated · 14 days ago