首页 /研究 /Standardization of Reporting Surgical Complications—Are We Ready?
SURGICAL

Standardization of Reporting Surgical Complications—Are We Ready?

Tracey L. Krupski

发表年份
2010
引用次数
6

摘要

No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorial1 May 2010Standardization of Reporting Surgical Complications—Are We Ready?is companion ofReporting of Harm in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Urological LiteratureRobotic Radical Prostatectomy for Elderly Patients: Probability of Achieving Continence and Potency 1 Year After SurgeryQuality of Life After Open or Robotic Prostatectomy, Cryoablation or Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer Tracey L. Krupski Tracey L. KrupskiTracey L. Krupski More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2374AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Standardization of Reporting Surgical Complications—Are We Ready?." The Journal of Urology, 183(5), pp. 1671–1672 References 1 : Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology2007; 69: 221. Google Scholar 2 : The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care: National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg1998; 228: 491. Google Scholar 3 : Public reporting of hospital quality: recommendations to benefit patients and hospitals. J Hosp Med2009; 4: 541. Google Scholar 4 : The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg2002; 236: 344. Google Scholar 5 : Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg2006; 203: 618. Google Scholar 6 : Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med2008; 148: 111. Google Scholar 7 : Quality of cardiac surgeons and managed care contracting practices. Health Serv Res2002; 37: 1129. Google Scholar Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesJournal of Urology17 Mar 2010Reporting of Harm in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Urological LiteratureJournal of Urology17 Mar 2010Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Elderly Patients: Probability of Achieving Continence and Potency 1 Year After SurgeryJournal of Urology18 Mar 2010Quality of Life After Open or Robotic Prostatectomy, Cryoablation or Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer Volume 183Issue 5May 2010Page: 1671-1672 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Tracey L. Krupski More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

关键词

MedicineProstatectomyCredentialingGeneral surgeryVeterans AffairsStandardizationProstate cancerNursingInternal medicineCancer

相关论文

查看 SURGICAL 分类全部论文