首页 /研究 /Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery for Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review of Key Elements and Advancements
SURGICAL

Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery for Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review of Key Elements and Advancements

Simon Goecke, Leonard Pitts, Martina Dini, Matteo Montagner, Leonhard Wert, Serdar Akansel, Markus Kofler, Christian Stoppe, Sascha Ott, Stephan Jacobs, Benjamin O’Brien, Volkmar Falk, Matthias Hommel, Jörg Kempfert

发表年份
2025
引用次数
10
访问权限
开放获取

摘要

Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS), integrated within enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs, is a pivotal advancement in modern cardiac surgery, aiming to reduce perioperative morbidity and accelerate recovery. This systematic review analyzes the integration of ERAS components into MIVS programs and evaluates their impact on perioperative outcomes and patient recovery. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, identified studies on ERAS in MIVS patients. Coronary and robotic surgery were excluded to prioritize widely adopted minimally invasive valve methods. Studies were included if they applied ERAS protocols primarily to MIVS patients, with at least five participants per study. Data on study characteristics, ERAS components, and patient outcomes were extracted for analysis. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 1287 MIVS patients (842 ERAS, 445 non-ERAS). ERAS protocols in MIVS were heterogeneous, with studies implementing 9 to 18 of 24 ERAS measures recommended by the ERAS consensus guideline, reflecting local hospital practices and resource availability. Common elements include patient education and multidisciplinary teams, early extubation followed by mobilization, multimodal opioid-sparing pain management, and timely removal of invasive lines. Despite protocol variability, these programs were associated with reduced morbidity, shorter hospital stays (intensive care unit-stay reductions of 4–20 h to complete omission, and total length of stay by ≥1 day), and cost savings of up to EUR 1909.8 per patient without compromising safety. Conclusions: ERAS protocols and MIVS synergistically enhance recovery and reduce the length of hospital stay. Standardizing ERAS protocols for MVS could amplify these benefits and broaden adoption.

关键词

MedicineMEDLINEPerioperativeIntensive care medicineSystematic reviewGuidelineProtocol (science)Medical emergencySurgeryAlternative medicine

相关论文

查看 SURGICAL 分类全部论文