Management of Adult Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction—Is it Time for a New Gold Standard?

摘要

No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorial1 Sep 2006Management of Adult Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction—Is it Time for a New Gold Standard?is companion ofRetrospective Comparison of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Versus Open Dismembered Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction ObstructionLaparoscopy Versus Dorsal Lumbotomy for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair Howard N. Winfield Howard N. WinfieldHoward N. Winfield More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.094AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Management of Adult Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction—Is it Time for a New Gold Standard?." The Journal of Urology, 176(3), pp. 866–867 References 1 : Management of upper urinary tract obstruction. In: Campbell’s Urology. Edited by . Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co2002: 463. Google Scholar 2 : Endopyelotomy: patient selection, results, and complications. Urology1994; 43: 2. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3 : Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology1995; 46: 791. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4 : Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: a critical analysis of prognostic factors. J Urol1994; 151: 934. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Functional evaluation of crossing vessels on ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol2006; 175: 15. abstract 42. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Trends in ureteropelvic junction obstruction management among urologists in the United States. Urology2005; 65: 260. Google Scholar 7 : Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology2006; 67: 932. Google Scholar Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa© 2006 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byOzayar A, Morgan M, Friedlander J, Saumur M, Krishan G, Gahan J and Cadeddu J (2014) Prompt Management of Anastomotic Leak or Acute Obstruction after Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty with Percutaneous Nephrostomy Preserves OutcomesJournal of Urology, VOL. 192, NO. 6, (1716-1719), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014.Etafy M, Pick D, Said S, Hsueh T, Kerbl D, Mucksavage P, Louie M, McDougall E and Clayman R (2011) Robotic Pyeloplasty: The University of California-Irvine ExperienceJournal of Urology, VOL. 185, NO. 6, (2196-2200), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.Braga L, Lorenzo A, Bägli D, Mahdi M, Salle J, Khoury A and Farhat W (2009) Comparison of Flank, Dorsal Lumbotomy and Laparoscopic Approaches for Dismembered Pyeloplasty in Children Older Than 3 Years With Ureteropelvic Junction ObstructionJournal of Urology, VOL. 183, NO. 1, (306-311), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010.Mufarrij P, Woods M, Shah O, Palese M, Berger A, Thomas R and Stifelman M (2008) Robotic Dismembered Pyeloplasty: A 6-Year, Multi-Institutional ExperienceJournal of Urology, VOL. 180, NO. 4, (1391-1396), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008.Related articlesJournal of Urology9 Nov 2018Retrospective Comparison of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Versus Open Dismembered Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction ObstructionJournal of Urology9 Nov 2018Laparoscopy Versus Dorsal Lumbotomy for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair Volume 176Issue 3September 2006Page: 866-867 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2006 by American Urological AssociationMetricsAuthor Information Howard N. Winfield More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...