Nathan J. Lee

NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Texas Health Dallas, New York Proton Center, Rush University Medical Center

Papers

9

Total Citations

174

H-Index

6

About

No biography available yet.

Research Focus

Medicine9 · 174 citations
Surgery9 · 174 citations
Robotic surgery6 · 140 citations
Lumbar5 · 96 citations
Artificial intelligence4 · 78 citations
Robot4 · 78 citations
Propensity score matching3 · 75 citations
Computer science3 · 75 citations
Percutaneous2 · 70 citations
Spondylolisthesis3 · 67 citations
Perioperative2 · 53 citations
Orthopedic surgery2 · 42 citations

Key Achievements

6
H-Index
9
Papers
174
Total Citations
19
Avg Citations/Paper
🏆 Most Cited Paper
Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients
49 citations · 2021
📈 Most Prolific Year: 2021 (7 Papers)
🤝 Key Collaborators: 34
🏛 Institutions: NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Texas Health Dallas, New York Proton Center, Rush University Medical Center

Top Papers

  1. 1
    Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients
    49 citations · 2021
  2. 2
    A multicenter study of the 5-year trends in robot-assisted spine surgery outcomes and complications
    41 citations · 2022
  3. 3
    The accuracy of robot-assisted S2 alar-iliac screw placement at two different healthcare centers
    22 citations · 2021
  4. 4
    Do robot-related complications influence 1 year reoperations and other clinical outcomes after robot-assisted lumbar arthrodesis? A multicenter assessment of 320 patients
    21 citations · 2021
  5. 5
    Is There a Difference in Screw Accuracy, Robot Time Per Screw, Robot Abandonment, and Radiation Exposure Between the Mazor X and the Renaissance? A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 1179 Robot-Assisted Screws
    21 citations · 2021
  6. 6
    Clinical and patient-reported outcomes after robot-assisted short-segment lumbar fusion with a minimum 1-year follow-up
    8 citations · 2021
  7. 7
    P16. Is there a difference in screw accuracy, robot time per screw, robot abandonment, and radiation exposure between the Mazor X and the renaissance? A propensity-matched analysis of 1,179 robot-assisted screws
    5 citations · 2021
  8. 8
    Does robot-assisted spine surgery for multi-level lumbar fusion achieve better patient-reported outcomes than free-hand techniques?
    4 citations · 2021
  9. 9
    Ninety-Day Complication and Revision Surgery Rates Using Navigated Robotics in Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery: A PRoGRSS Interim Analysis
    3 citations · 2025

Key Collaborators

RARonald A. Lehman9 shared papersJMJoseph M. Lombardi8 shared papersELEric Leung8 shared papersJMJustin Mathew7 shared papersVBVenkat Boddapati7 shared papersSLScott L. Zuckerman5 shared papersPPPaul Park5 shared papersEJEhsan Jazini4 shared papersGMGerard Marciano4 shared papersCMColin M. Haines4 shared papersJPJohn Pollina4 shared papersCRChristopher R. Good4 shared papersIAIan A. Buchanan4 shared papersALAvery L. Buchholz3 shared papersTCThomas C. Schuler3 shared papersNLNikita Lakomkin2 shared papersJPJeffrey P. Mullin2 shared papersAKAsham Khan2 shared papersTATyler Amell-Angst1 shared papersRRRita Roy1 shared papers
Not generated yet